The workshop is the front door.
Three days. Free. No demo theater. Bring one real workflow you keep meaning to fix and leave with it codified, running on Claude, with the verification gate already in line.
D.B. Law is the authority property of Digital Boutique AI (DBAI) on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in law firms.
It exists because no one was speaking to the actual attorney sitting at 11:43 PM with 47 tabs open. Most legal-AI marketing is sold by people who have never billed an hour. We’ve been on the other side of that demo. We’re not going to do it to you.
If Artificial Intelligence (AI) can do what an associate does in an afternoon, what is the attorney for? Until you answer that, every product purchase is procrastination dressed up as progress.
Everything D.B. Law publishes — the workshop, the frame, the audit, this page — descends from that line.
The fastest way to make a brand useful to its audience is to refuse the audiences it would fail to serve.
Four months of research moved nothing because the real question underneath was “what am I for?” Until that’s resolved, every demo is procrastination.
Drafts, summaries, first-pass review — tasks. Judgment, accountability, candor, the client relationship — not tasks. The shift is from doing the task to setting the criteria the task runs against.
Skip Codify and you get faster chaos. The Amplifier Stack is non-negotiable in order: extract your judgment into a written playbook first, wire Claude to run it second, multiply yourself third.
Every workflow we ship carries a human-in-the-loop cite-check that refuses to release work it cannot verify. Mapped to American Bar Association (ABA) Formal Opinion 512: Competence, Confidentiality, Candor, Supervision.
Harvey, Clio Duo, Paxton, half the rest. The model isn’t the differentiator. Your data, your integrations, your codified workflow are. Which is why we build direct on Claude at $25/seat instead of reselling someone’s $1,200/seat wrapper.
We won’t fabricate statistics.
The five figures on the home page are the only ones we cite. If a number isn’t verifiable, it doesn’t go on the page.
We won’t display client logos we haven’t earned.
When we have legal-vertical case work to show, it will appear here with the client’s written permission. Not before.
We won’t claim an Anthropic partnership we don’t have.
We build on Anthropic’s Claude as Claude implementation specialists. That’s the line — verbatim — and we keep it.
We won’t pretend a tool is a workflow.
Buying Harvey, Spellbook, or Claude Team is a transaction. A codified judgment-driven workflow is the asset. We’ll keep saying it.
We won’t put a person on this page.
D.B. Law is a brand and a frame, not a founder cult. If you want to know who we are, read what we believe.
DBAI is a Claude implementation specialist firm. We build judgment-driven workflows on Anthropic’s Claude, with verification gates in line, for teams that want the AI work to hold up six months from now.D.B. Law is our property for the legal vertical — one of several focused properties we publish.
If you want the full picture of what DBAI does, visit the parent. If you’re here for the legal work, start at the workshop.
Three days. Free. No demo theater. Bring one real workflow you keep meaning to fix and leave with it codified, running on Claude, with the verification gate already in line.